Central Bank Digital Currencies
The Government Wants Inside Your Wallet — For Your Own Good
When a central bank issues a digital currency, it doesn't just change how you pay for things — it changes what money itself is allowed to do.
The Idea
Cash has a superpower that almost nobody talks about: it is anonymous, it cannot be switched off, and it does not expire. When you hand over a note, no one records the transaction, no algorithm flags it, and no regulator can reverse it. Central bank digital currencies — CBDCs — are, in their most ambitious form, the end of all that. A CBDC is not like a bank balance, which is already digital. Your bank balance is a promise from a commercial bank; a CBDC would be a direct claim on the central bank itself, the same institution that prints the notes in your pocket. That sounds like a technical distinction, but it reshapes the entire architecture of money. Here is what makes CBDCs genuinely strange: they are programmable. A government could, in principle, issue digital currency that expires if not spent within a set window — useful for stimulus, ruinous for saving. It could restrict certain currencies to certain categories of purchase. It could, in a crisis, impose a negative interest rate not just on bank accounts but on money itself, making hoarding expensive in a way that physical cash has always protected against. None of this is inevitable. Many CBDC proposals are deliberately limited — designed to mimic cash more than replace it. But the design choices made now are not neutral. They encode assumptions about trust, surveillance, and state power that will be very hard to unpick later.
In the World
In 2021, Nigeria launched the eNaira — one of the first full national CBDCs in the world. The pitch was sensible and well-intentioned: bring millions of unbanked Nigerians into the formal economy, reduce the cost of remittances, make government payments faster and cheaper. All real problems. All things a digital currency might genuinely help with. The rollout was, by most measures, a disappointment. Eighteen months in, fewer than 0.5% of Nigerians were using it regularly. The government tried an unusual lever to push adoption: it severely restricted cash withdrawals from ATMs, making eNaira the path of least resistance for many transactions. Critics called it coercion. Supporters called it pragmatic change management. Either way, it revealed something important: the case for a CBDC and the public's willingness to trust one are entirely different conversations. China's digital yuan experiment is further along and raises different questions. Trials have run in dozens of cities, with digital currency distributed via lotteries, transit apps, and employer payrolls. The technical infrastructure is impressive. But the digital yuan also allows the People's Bank of China to track transactions in a way physical renminbi never could — and in a state with an active social credit apparatus, that is not a theoretical concern. The programmability that economists find intellectually interesting is precisely what civil liberties researchers find alarming. The same feature. Two completely different problems.
Why It Matters
Most of us will encounter a CBDC — or a choice about whether to — within a decade. The European Central Bank is deep in its digital euro project. The Federal Reserve is studying one. Over 130 countries, representing the vast majority of global economic output, are at some stage of research or development. The decisions being made now — by designers, legislators, and central bankers — will determine whether these systems resemble digital cash or digital surveillance infrastructure. And those decisions are not being made with much public input, partly because the subject feels too technical to engage with. That framing is worth resisting. The questions are not technical. They are political. Who can see your transactions, and under what circumstances? Can money be programmed to expire? Can it be blocked? Can a government deploy monetary policy at the level of the individual rather than the economy? Understanding CBDCs is not about predicting the future of payments. It is about having a view on what kind of relationship you want between the state, the banking system, and your own economic life — before that relationship is decided for you.
A Question to Ponder
If your government introduced a digital currency that was more convenient and more traceable than cash, how much of your anonymity would you trade away — and for what?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable