Animal Behaviour — Play
Why Ravens Sled and Rats Laugh: The Serious Science of Animal Play
When a young raven repeatedly slides down a snowy roof, climbs back up, and does it again, it isn't practising anything — it's just playing, and that fact should unsettle everything we thought we knew about why fun exists.
The Idea
Play is one of those things that seems obvious until you try to define it scientifically — at which point it becomes genuinely strange. Biologists tend to describe play as voluntary behaviour that is intrinsically motivated, structurally similar to 'serious' behaviour but performed out of context, and repeated for its own sake. The last part is the puzzle. Natural selection is ruthlessly economical. Behaviour that costs energy, increases injury risk, and produces no immediate survival benefit should have been weeded out long ago. And yet play is ancient, widespread, and persistent — found in mammals, birds, some reptiles, and possibly octopuses. The leading hypotheses frame play as deferred investment: young animals practise motor skills, rehearse social negotiations, or stress-test their nervous systems in low-stakes conditions. These are plausible, but they don't fully account for the evidence. Adult animals play too, often intensely. Ravens, known for their cognitive flexibility, engage in object play and aerial acrobatics with no obvious training payoff. Rats, when tickled in specific ways, emit ultrasonic vocalisations at around 50 kHz that researchers interpret as a signature of positive affect — what you might cautiously call laughter. What's increasingly compelling is the idea that play may train not specific skills but something more general: the capacity to handle novelty. An animal that has played widely — that has experienced surprise, improvisation, and the unexpected — may simply be better at coping with an unpredictable world. Play, on this view, is less about rehearsal and more about building a flexible, resilient mind.
In the World
In the late 1990s, neuroscientist Jaak Panksepp made a discovery that his peers found hard to take seriously: rats, when roughhoused and tickled in a particular way, produce high-frequency chirps that share key features with human laughter. The vocalisations occurred during play, increased when the animals initiated contact, and were associated with the brain's reward circuitry. Panksepp spent years arguing that this pointed to something real — a shared evolutionary root for positive social emotion — in a field deeply uncomfortable with attributing feelings to non-human animals. The rats would seek out the tickling. They would follow the experimenter's hand around the cage. When given a choice, they preferred the company of other rats who chirped frequently over those who didn't. The play wasn't random; it had social grammar. Rats that played more as juveniles developed better social bonds and showed more cognitive flexibility as adults. Meanwhile, field researchers were documenting similarly hard-to-explain behaviour in ravens across Europe and North America. Birds had been filmed repeatedly sliding down snowy slopes on their backs, apparently for no reason other than the activity itself. One raven was filmed using a bottle cap as a sledge. These weren't young birds fumbling through motor learning — they were experienced adults doing something that looked, from the outside, unmistakably like fun. Panksepp's work, which he spent a career defending, is now considered foundational to affective neuroscience — the study of the biological basis of emotion. He called play one of the seven primary emotional systems shared across mammals, as fundamental as fear or rage.
Why It Matters
There's a temptation to read animal play as a mirror of human leisure — cute, relatable, slightly reassuring. But the more interesting move is the reverse: to look at what animal play research reveals about the nature of minds in general. If play is ancient, if it's conserved across hundreds of millions of years of evolution, if rats have something functionally analogous to laughter — then the sharp line we've drawn between human inner life and animal experience starts to look like a convenience rather than a fact. Panksepp's work nudged mainstream neuroscience toward taking animal emotion seriously, which has downstream consequences for how we think about cognition, welfare, and what it means to have a subjective experience at all. For how you move through your own life, there's something here too. The 'play as resilience training' hypothesis suggests that unstructured, intrinsically motivated exploration isn't frivolous — it may be precisely what builds adaptive capacity. Adults who protect time for genuine play — not optimised leisure, not productive hobbies, but genuinely purposeless enjoyment — might be doing something more cognitively significant than they realise.
A Question to Ponder
If play turns out to be less about practising specific skills and more about building a mind that can handle surprise — what in your own life actually qualifies as play, and what only looks like it?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable