What we lose and gain in a digital age
The Friction That Was Actually Doing Something
The moment we removed the small annoyances from daily life, we accidentally removed some of the thinking that went with them.
The Idea
There is a concept in cognitive science called 'desirable difficulty' — the idea that certain kinds of friction in learning and decision-making actually produce better outcomes. Struggling to recall something, for instance, strengthens memory more than re-reading it passively. The effort is the point. What is less often discussed is how this principle extends beyond formal learning into the texture of ordinary life — and what happens when technology systematically eliminates that texture. Consider what it meant to navigate an unfamiliar city with a paper map. You had to orient yourself spatially, make predictions, hold a mental model of where you were in relation to where you were going. You were wrong sometimes and had to recalibrate. Neuroscientists who study spatial cognition call this process of active wayfinding a genuine workout for the hippocampus — the brain region central not just to navigation but to memory and imagination. Turn-by-turn GPS does not merely replace that process; it substitutes a different cognitive mode entirely, one that is reactive rather than generative. This is not a nostalgic argument for inconvenience. The gains from digital tools are real and unevenly distributed in ways that matter — accessibility, speed, inclusion. But the specific losses deserve naming clearly. When we outsource a cognitive task to a system that handles it more efficiently than we can, we are not simply freeing up mental bandwidth. We are, over time, allowing the relevant capacity to atrophy. The question worth sitting with is not whether the trade is good or bad — it is whether we are making it consciously.
In the World
In 2008, a neuroscientist named Eleanor Maguire at University College London published a study that had been a decade in the making. She and her colleagues scanned the brains of London taxi drivers — people who had spent years memorising 'The Knowledge', a gruelling test requiring mastery of some 25,000 streets and thousands of points of interest across the city. The posterior hippocampus of experienced drivers was measurably larger than that of non-drivers. More striking still: the longer a driver had been working, the more pronounced the difference. The brain had physically reorganised itself around the demands of the job. Then came the GPS era. A follow-up line of research, including work by Amir-Homayoun Javadi, found that people navigating with GPS showed significantly less hippocampal and prefrontal activity than those navigating without it. The brain, given the option to disengage, took it. None of this is a verdict against GPS. London taxi drivers are an extreme case, and most of us were not building exceptional spatial maps before smartphones arrived. But the mechanism is real and general. Every time a tool handles a task that once required active mental engagement — remembering phone numbers, doing rough arithmetic, recalling a word without autocomplete — the neural circuitry that supported that task gets less use. The brain is ruthlessly efficient. It does not maintain what it does not need. The taxi drivers showed us what sustained cognitive effort can build. The GPS studies hint at what convenience can quietly undo.
Why It Matters
None of this should send anyone back to paper maps out of principle. But it does suggest something worth holding: the experience of effort is often doing invisible work, and we have little cultural vocabulary for valuing it. We are extremely good at measuring what technology gives us — speed, reach, recall, convenience — and quite poor at accounting for what it quietly asks us to stop doing. The sharper question is about agency. Most of the trade-offs in digital life are not chosen; they are simply the ambient conditions of using tools that were designed to maximise engagement and minimise friction. Being conscious of this does not require rejecting the tools. It might mean occasionally choosing the harder path — looking something up in your own memory before searching, walking a route you do not quite know without guidance — not out of nostalgia but as a kind of deliberate practice. The goal is not to be a taxi driver. It is to notice when you are outsourcing something that was, quietly, keeping a part of you sharp.
A Question to Ponder
Which cognitive tasks have you gradually handed over to technology without ever deciding to — and what would it feel like to reclaim even one of them?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable