Fairy Tales and Their Origins
Before Disney, Before Grimm: The Brutal Older Life of Fairy Tales
The earliest known version of Cinderella is roughly two thousand years old, and in it, nobody is particularly kind to anyone.
The Idea
Fairy tales have a reputation problem — or rather, a reputation that is too clean. The versions most people carry around in their heads were sanitised, first by the Brothers Grimm (who softened their own stories across successive editions as middle-class tastes shifted), and then more aggressively by twentieth-century entertainment. But strip that away, and you find something far stranger and more interesting underneath. Folklorists like Vladimir Propp and, later, scholars such as Jack Zipes have argued that fairy tales are not children's entertainment that happened to pick up some darkness along the way. They are fundamentally adult literature — tools for processing fear, desire, social precarity, and death — that were only reassigned to children when the category of 'childhood' itself became a sentimental project in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The stories themselves are ancient, and their geography is vast. Researchers using phylogenetic methods — the same statistical tools used to trace the evolution of species — have traced some tale types back four to six thousand years, crossing continents long before literacy made that kind of spread easy to document. 'Beauty and the Beast' appears to share a common ancestor with stories from ancient Rome. 'Jack and the Beanstalk' may descend from a Proto-Indo-European tale about a sky giant. What this means is that a fairy tale is less a fixed story than a long argument a culture is having with itself — about power, gender, survival, and what we owe each other — revised with every telling.
In the World
In 2016, folklorist Sara Graça da Silva and biologist Jamshid Tehrani published a study in Royal Society Open Science that used phylogenetic analysis to map the ancestry of 275 fairy tales across Indo-European language families. Their most startling finding involved 'The Smith and the Devil' — a tale in which a blacksmith makes a deal with a demonic figure, outsmarts him, and wins. It showed up in enough distinct cultural branches that the researchers dated it to the Bronze Age, roughly 6,000 years ago. This is not the story you know. It has no princess, no glass slipper, no moral about being good. It is a story about a craftsman, a dangerous bargain, and a trick — much closer to the texture of actual pre-modern life, where the devil you outfoxed was as likely to be a creditor or a lord as a supernatural being. What the study quietly confirms is something that oral storytellers have always known: a tale survives not because it is sweet, but because it is load-bearing. It carries something the community needs to keep saying. The prettiness is a later addition, a kind of packaging applied once the story moved from the fireplace to the nursery to the gift shop. Underneath, the argument is still going — about who holds power, who gets to make deals, and whether cleverness is enough to save you.
Why It Matters
There is something quietly useful in knowing that the stories we think of as simple were never meant to be. It changes how you read them, but more than that, it changes how you think about which stories your own culture treats as foundational — and what they are actually doing. Every era rewrites its fairy tales. Disney's revisions in the mid-twentieth century emphasised romantic resolution and female passivity in ways that felt natural then and feel jarring now. The wave of 'dark' fairy tale retellings over the last few decades — in literary fiction, film, and graphic novels — is itself a form of the same process: a culture renegotiating what the stories are for. Knowing the longer history makes you a more active reader of all of it. You start to notice what each version adds and, more revealingly, what each version removes. The thing that gets cut is usually the thing that made the original audience uncomfortable — which means it is almost certainly the most interesting part. The question 'what was taken out, and why?' turns out to be one of the more productive questions you can ask about any story, not just old ones.
A Question to Ponder
Which fairy tale from your own childhood, if you stripped away everything added after 1800, do you think would be unrecognisable — and what does that gap tell you about what your culture needed children to believe?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable