Quantum Computing
The Particle That Is Two Things at Once — Until You Look
The most powerful computers being built today work by exploiting a rule of physics so strange that even the scientists who use it argue about what it actually means.
The Idea
Classical computers are, at their core, relentlessly binary. Every piece of information is a bit — a switch that is either on or off, one or zero. Quantum computers replace bits with qubits, and a qubit can exist in a superposition of both states simultaneously. Not a mix, not an average — genuinely both, until the moment it is measured. At measurement, it 'collapses' into a definite value. This is not a metaphor or a limitation of our knowledge; it is how quantum systems actually behave. Now combine that with entanglement. When two qubits become entangled, their states are correlated in a way that cannot be explained by classical physics. Measure one, and you instantly know something about the other — regardless of the distance between them. Einstein famously hated this, calling it 'spooky action at a distance,' and spent years trying to prove it was an illusion. Experiments since the 1980s have confirmed he was wrong. Here is the genuinely surprising part: a quantum computer does not just run calculations faster. It runs them differently. By holding many possible states simultaneously, it can explore vast solution spaces in parallel — certain problems that would take a classical computer longer than the age of the universe can, in principle, be cracked in hours. The catch is that reading the answer requires coaxing the right solution to 'win' when the quantum state collapses. That coaxing — quantum algorithm design — is where the real intellectual difficulty lives.
In the World
In 2019, Google published a paper in Nature claiming its 53-qubit Sycamore processor had completed a specific calculation in 200 seconds — a task it said would take the world's most powerful classical supercomputer approximately 10,000 years. The claim was immediately contested by IBM, whose researchers argued the same task could be done classically in 2.5 days with the right storage tricks. But even granting IBM's counter, the gap was extraordinary: 200 seconds versus 2.5 days. What made Sycamore's result possible was the precise management of entangled qubits across the processor. The team had to keep qubits in coherent superposition long enough to perform operations, then measure the output before environmental noise — heat, vibration, stray electromagnetic fields — caused the quantum state to collapse prematurely. This fragility is the central engineering challenge: quantum states are so delicate that even the act of existing in room temperature is enough to destroy them. Google's qubits operate near absolute zero, colder than outer space. The task Sycamore performed was essentially useless in practical terms — it was a sampling problem designed specifically to be hard for classical computers. But it was a proof of concept for something physicists had theorised for decades: that quantum advantage is real, achievable, and measurable. The race since then has been about scaling up while keeping the error rates manageable — something no one has fully solved yet.
Why It Matters
Understanding superposition and entanglement matters beyond knowing what quantum computers are — it changes how you think about what computation itself is. For most of computing history, 'faster' meant more transistors, better architecture, smarter software. Quantum computing suggests a more radical idea: that the structure of physical reality contains computational shortcuts we have barely begun to map. The near-term implications are specific. Quantum computers are expected to eventually break many of the encryption standards that secure financial systems, medical records, and private communications — not because they are faster, but because certain problems (like factoring enormous prime numbers) are structurally easier for quantum systems. Governments and security agencies are already preparing for this, migrating to 'post-quantum' encryption standards. But beyond security, quantum computing points toward entirely new capabilities in drug discovery, materials science, and climate modelling — problems where the number of variables is so large that classical approximation becomes misleading. Whether or not you ever interact with a quantum computer directly, the decisions being made in labs right now about how to build and govern this technology will shape the infrastructure of the next century.
A Question to Ponder
If quantum systems only reveal a definite answer when observed, and quantum computers exploit the in-between state to compute — what does that suggest about the relationship between reality and the act of measurement?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable