The History of the Internet
How Microsoft Crushed Netscape — and Almost Killed the Open Web
The browser war of the 1990s wasn't really about browsers — it was about who would own the future of commerce, communication, and power.
The Idea
In 1995, Netscape Navigator was the closest thing the early web had to a front door. It ran on any operating system, it was fast, and it made the internet feel like something ordinary people could actually use. Netscape's IPO that August — the company had barely turned a profit — became one of the most electric moments in financial history and effectively announced that the web was now a serious business. Microsoft, then at the apex of its dominance through Windows, was slow to recognise the threat. But when Bill Gates wrote his famous 'Internet Tidal Wave' memo in May 1995, the company pivoted with alarming speed. Internet Explorer was bundled directly into Windows — not sold, not offered as an optional download, but pre-installed, free, and deeply integrated into the operating system itself. Suddenly, every new PC shipped with a browser already attached. This is the move that defines the whole episode. Netscape had to convince people to seek out, download, and install its product. Microsoft just had to do nothing — the browser came with the machine. It was a masterclass in using a dominant position in one market (desktop operating systems) to colonise an adjacent one (browsers). The strategy was so effective, and so deliberately anti-competitive, that it eventually triggered one of the most significant antitrust cases in tech history. But by the time the courts weighed in, Netscape was already finished.
In the World
The human face of this collision was Jim Barksdale, Netscape's CEO, sitting across from a Senate Judiciary Committee in 1998 and trying to explain to legislators why what Microsoft had done was genuinely dangerous — not just to his company, but to the structure of the internet itself. The Justice Department and twenty US states had filed suit against Microsoft, arguing that bundling Internet Explorer with Windows was an illegal attempt to monopolise the browser market. The trial became a spectacle: Microsoft's own executives were shown videotaped depositions in which they appeared evasive or flatly contradicted by contemporaneous documents. Bill Gates, in his deposition, famously parsed the meaning of words like 'compete' and 'concerned' with a lawyerly caution that struck many observers as absurd given the content of the internal emails being read into the record. In 2000, Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson ruled that Microsoft had indeed violated antitrust law and ordered the company to be broken up into two separate entities. That ruling was overturned on appeal, and the eventual settlement — reached during the Bush administration in 2001 — was widely seen as a slap on the wrist. Microsoft remained whole. Netscape, meanwhile, had been acquired by AOL in 1998 and quietly wound down. Its browser engine, however, was open-sourced and eventually gave rise to Firefox, and later to the foundations of Chrome. The Netscape story didn't quite end — it just changed shape.
Why It Matters
The browser war established a template that tech has followed ever since: identify the layer of infrastructure that will matter most, and control it before anyone else can. What Microsoft did with Internet Explorer, others have done with app stores, search defaults, social login buttons, and mapping APIs. The tactic is always roughly the same — use your existing dominance to make your product the path of least resistance, and make the alternative feel like extra work. What's worth sitting with is how quickly a genuinely open, pluralistic technology can get captured once serious money enters the picture. The early web felt like a commons. Within a decade, it was a battleground between a handful of enormous companies. That pattern has accelerated rather than slowed. Every time a new technology — generative AI, spatial computing, decentralised protocols — appears genuinely open at the edges, it's worth asking who is quietly positioning themselves to own the infrastructure underneath it. The browser war is a useful lens because it happened fast enough to be legible, and the moves are now clear in hindsight in a way that live battles rarely are.
A Question to Ponder
When a powerful company gives something away for free, what exactly are they getting in return — and who decides whether that trade is fair?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable