Kierkegaard's Leap of Faith
The Abyss Is the Point: What Kierkegaard Actually Meant by the Leap
Kierkegaard's leap of faith has nothing to do with switching your brain off — it's a demand that you think harder than you ever have, and then do something reason alone cannot justify.
The Idea
Most people encounter Kierkegaard's leap of faith as a kind of permission slip for irrationality: when logic runs out, just believe. This is almost exactly backwards. Kierkegaard was not anti-reason; he was deeply troubled by the people of his era who thought reason could settle every question, including the most important ones — how to live, what to commit to, who to become. His argument was more unsettling: reason can take you to the very edge of an answer, but the final step across requires something reason cannot supply. He called this the leap. The gap is not a failure of thinking. It is a structural feature of the most significant choices a human being can make. Kierkegaard organised human existence into three stages — the aesthetic (the pursuit of pleasure and sensation), the ethical (living by universal moral codes), and the religious (a direct, personal relationship with the infinite). Each stage is internally coherent. But you cannot reason your way from one to the next. The transition demands a discontinuous act of will — a commitment made without the comfort of certainty, and with full awareness of the anxiety that entails. What he called Angst — that vertiginous sense of facing infinite possibility with no guaranteed ground beneath you — is not an obstacle to the leap. It is the sensation of standing at the place where the leap becomes necessary. You feel it, and then you jump.
In the World
In 1842, the Danish philosopher broke off his engagement to Regine Olsen — a woman he appears to have loved deeply and thought about for the rest of his life. The decision made no clear rational sense, and Kierkegaard knew it. He spent years writing about it indirectly, through pseudonyms and fictional characters, circling the same knot: some choices cannot be explained after the fact without betraying their nature. In his book Either/Or, he constructed an elaborate dialogue between two modes of life — the hedonist who collects experiences, and the ethicist who lives by duty and principle. Both figures are brilliantly articulate. Neither can logically defeat the other. And that is precisely the point. When you have genuinely exhausted argument, when both paths are honestly available to you, the act of choosing one is not a conclusion — it is a commitment that constitutes who you are. This is what makes it a leap rather than a step. Abraham, the figure Kierkegaard returns to obsessively in Fear and Trembling, is his ultimate example: a man asked to do something that contradicts every ethical principle he holds, with no rational framework that can make it acceptable, and who moves forward anyway. Kierkegaard is not endorsing the act. He is pointing to the structure: there are moments when a person steps beyond the calculable, and that stepping-beyond is the most fully human thing they ever do.
Why It Matters
There is a particular kind of paralysis that afflicts thoughtful people — the sense that if you gather enough information, run enough mental models, consider enough angles, the right answer will eventually crystallise. Kierkegaard is a useful disruption to this. He is not telling you to stop thinking; he is pointing out that the most consequential commitments in a life — a relationship, a vocation, a set of values you will actually live by rather than merely admire — have an irreducibly non-rational core. You will never feel fully ready. The anxiety before the leap is not a signal to wait longer. It is the texture of genuine freedom. Recognising this can be oddly liberating. It reframes the discomfort of uncertainty not as a problem to be solved but as evidence that you are standing somewhere real. The question is not how to eliminate the gap — it is whether you have the courage to cross it. That is a question worth sitting with on a Monday morning.
A Question to Ponder
Is there a commitment in your life that you have been waiting for certainty before making — and what would it mean to accept that the certainty will never arrive?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable