Quantum Computing
The Bit That Can't Make Up Its Mind — And Why That's Powerful
Classical computers have never truly computed anything simultaneously — but quantum computers, if you read them correctly, sort of do.
The Idea
A classical bit is a switch: on or off, one or zero, no ambiguity. Everything your phone, laptop, and the server farms underpinning the internet do reduces, ultimately, to billions of these binary decisions made in sequence. It works brilliantly. It also has a hard ceiling. A qubit — a quantum bit — operates by different rules entirely. Before you measure it, a qubit exists in a superposition of zero and one simultaneously. Not randomly flickering between them. Not secretly one-or-the-other and you just don't know which. Genuinely, mathematically both at once, weighted by probability amplitudes that encode real information. The critical insight isn't superposition itself — it's what you can do with it before measurement collapses it. When you chain multiple qubits together, their superpositions interact through a phenomenon called entanglement. Two entangled qubits don't just hold two superpositions; they hold a joint quantum state that can't be described by looking at each qubit independently. Three entangled qubits can encode eight states simultaneously. Ten encode over a thousand. Fifty qubits can, in principle, represent more simultaneous states than there are atoms in a human body. The challenge — and it's a significant one — is that this fragile quantum state collapses the moment it interacts with the environment. Heat, vibration, even stray electromagnetic fields destroy the superposition in a process called decoherence. Building a machine that keeps qubits coherent long enough to be useful is less like engineering and more like trying to preserve a perfect soap bubble inside a hurricane.
In the World
In 2019, Google's quantum team published results claiming their 53-qubit processor, Sycamore, completed a specific mathematical task in 200 seconds — a task they estimated would take the world's most powerful classical supercomputer roughly 10,000 years. The claim was immediately contested by IBM, whose researchers argued the same task could be done classically in about two and a half days with clever optimisations. The actual gap was smaller than Google claimed, but the moment still illustrated something real: quantum processors can find shortcuts through certain computational landscapes that classical machines simply cannot navigate efficiently. The task Sycamore performed — verifying random quantum circuit samples — was essentially useless in a practical sense. It was a benchmark, not a breakthrough product. But this is how physics tends to work before it becomes engineering. The first laser was described as a solution looking for a problem. The transistor's inventors didn't immediately envision the smartphone. What researchers are now chasing is called quantum advantage on problems that matter: simulating molecular behaviour for drug discovery, optimising logistics networks, and — most consequentially — cracking the encryption that secures essentially all modern digital communication. That last application is why governments and intelligence agencies are watching qubit counts and coherence times with considerable interest. A sufficiently powerful quantum computer wouldn't just be faster. It would make certain problems that currently take longer than the age of the universe to solve suddenly tractable.
Why It Matters
Most people encounter quantum computing as hype — headlines swinging between 'will break the internet' and 'still decades away from usefulness.' Both framings miss what makes this genuinely interesting. Qubits matter because they represent a different relationship between information and physics. Classical computing treats physics as a substrate to be engineered around — we build reliable machines out of unreliable components. Quantum computing treats physics as the mechanism itself. The weirdness of quantum mechanics isn't a bug to be engineered away; it's the engine. Understanding this changes how you read the news around it. When you hear about a company achieving a new qubit count, the more important question is coherence time and error rates — how long those qubits stay useful before the environment corrupts them. When you hear about quantum encryption threats, you can appreciate that the timeline depends not just on qubit count but on the extraordinary engineering required to keep them stable. You don't need to follow every development. But understanding what a qubit actually is — not a magic fast-bit, but a genuinely different kind of information — means you're reasoning from the right foundation when this technology eventually moves from research labs into the world.
A Question to Ponder
If a quantum computer's power comes from maintaining ambiguity until the last possible moment, are there decisions in your own thinking where you collapse uncertainty too early — and what might you gain by holding it open a little longer?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable