Tool use in animals
The Crow That Planned Three Moves Ahead
For most of the twentieth century, scientists believed tool use was the cognitive boundary that separated humans from every other animal — and then a crow in a laboratory dismantled that idea with a piece of wire.
The Idea
Tool use was once considered the defining hallmark of human intelligence. When Jane Goodall reported in 1960 that chimpanzees in Gombe were stripping leaves from twigs to fish termites from mounds, her mentor Louis Leakey famously wrote: 'Now we must redefine tool, redefine man, or accept chimpanzees as humans.' The field of animal cognition has never quite recovered its composure since. What we now know is that tool use is not a single capacity but a spectrum — and some animals sit much further along it than anyone expected. The most conceptually interesting distinction is between spontaneous tool use and what researchers call 'metatool use': using one tool to obtain another. Even more demanding is sequential tool use — holding an intermediate goal in mind while working toward a final one. This requires mental representation of a future state that does not yet exist. It requires planning. For years, this kind of prospective cognition was thought to be uniquely human, tied to our capacity for episodic memory and what psychologists call 'mental time travel'. The surprise is not merely that other animals use tools. It is that some of them appear to think about tools — imagining absent objects, combining novel materials, and in at least a few documented cases, solving problems they have never encountered before in ways that suggest genuine, flexible reasoning rather than hardwired instinct or associative learning.
In the World
In 2002, a New Caledonian crow named Betty walked into a small enclosure at Oxford University and changed the conversation. The experiment was simple: a small bucket of food sat at the bottom of a vertical tube, reachable only with a hooked tool. Betty was given two wires — one already bent into a hook, one straight. Her partner crow took the hook. Without any training or prior experience with wire, Betty picked up the straight piece, wedged one end under a rubber mat, and bent it into a hook. She then used it to retrieve the food. The researchers, led by Alex Kacelnik, were stunned. This was not imitation. It was not a behaviour she had been reinforced for. She had never encountered wire before. She assessed the problem, identified a property of the material — its malleability — and manufactured a solution. Subsequent studies with New Caledonian crows have shown that they can solve eight-step sequential puzzles, unlocking a series of boxes to retrieve a tool they then use to access food. Each step only makes sense in relation to the final goal. These birds do not have a neocortex, the brain structure long assumed to be the seat of complex cognition in mammals. They are solving planning problems with entirely different neural architecture — which suggests that intelligence, at least of this particular kind, is less about the specific hardware than about the evolutionary pressure that shaped it.
Why It Matters
There is a quiet assumption baked into how most of us move through the world: that the minds around us — in the garden, in the ocean, in the trees — are largely dim compared to ours. Tool use research keeps puncturing that assumption with specific, undeniable evidence. A crow bending wire is not a metaphor or an anecdote. It is data, replicated and peer-reviewed, that demands a revision of how we understand the relationship between brain structure and intelligence. This matters practically, too. If sophisticated cognition can emerge through radically different neural architectures, it raises serious questions about how we treat animals whose intelligence we have historically dismissed. It also opens a genuinely fascinating question in evolutionary biology: when two unrelated lineages — primates and corvids — independently arrive at similar cognitive capacities, what does that convergence tell us about the problems intelligence evolved to solve? The next time you watch a bird work through a problem — a magpie tugging at a wrapper, a crow watching traffic — you are not watching instinct. You may be watching something think.
A Question to Ponder
If intelligence can evolve independently in birds and mammals through completely different brain structures, what does that suggest about the kinds of minds that might exist in animals we have barely studied?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable