Philosophy of Action
You Did It, But Did You Mean To? The Strange Line Between Action and Accident
Most of what you do today will feel chosen — but philosophers have spent centuries arguing that you can do something fully, consciously, and deliberately, and still not have truly intended it.
The Idea
Intentionality seems obvious until you look at it directly. You reach for your coffee, you send the email, you say the thing you probably shouldn't have — these feel like intended actions. But what actually makes an action intentional? The philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe, whose 1957 work Intention remains one of the sharpest treatments of the subject, argued that the key isn't the presence of some inner mental event — a private 'wanting' that precedes the act. It's whether the action falls under a description to which the question 'Why?' has a sensible answer that you can give. This is stranger and richer than it sounds. Right now, you might be tapping your foot. You're doing it. But ask yourself why, and the question feels malformed — there's no reason, it's just happening. Anscombe would say that makes it a mere event occurring in you, not an intentional action. The moment you can say 'because I'm nervous' or 'because I'm keeping the beat,' the foot-tapping gets recruited into intention. What follows is uncomfortable: enormous swathes of your daily behaviour — your tone of voice in an argument, the way your attention drifts, the choices that accumulate into a life — may be things you're doing without truly intending them, because you've never been asked, and never asked yourself, why.
In the World
In 1971, a US military court convicted Lieutenant William Calley for his role in the My Lai massacre — the killing of hundreds of unarmed Vietnamese civilians by American soldiers. Calley's defence rested partly on a claim that he was following orders, that the killings were not, in any meaningful sense, his own intended acts. The court rejected this, but the philosophical question it raised has never fully dissolved: can an action carried out under authority, under pressure, in a fog of deference, be called fully intentional? Anscombe herself was fiercely interested in this problem. She opposed the awarding of an honorary degree to Harry Truman at Oxford in 1956, on the grounds that he had intended the deaths of civilians at Hiroshima and Nagasaki — not as a tragic side effect, but as the very mechanism by which he hoped to end the war. Her argument was precise: if you choose a means, you intend what that means consists of. You cannot will the method and disclaim the content. This distinction — between what you aim at, what you foresee, and what you merely cause — sits at the heart of legal systems, of moral philosophy, and of ordinary self-understanding. It also surfaces every time someone says, after a cruel remark or a careless decision, 'I didn't mean it like that.' The question Anscombe presses on us is: what, exactly, did you mean?
Why It Matters
If intention requires that you can answer 'why' — not defensively, but genuinely — then living intentionally is less about slowing down and being mindful in some atmospheric sense, and more about being able to give an account of yourself. Not to others, necessarily, but to yourself. This reframes what it means to act with purpose. It's not enough to feel present, or to have good values in the abstract. The question is whether, at the level of individual actions, you know what you're doing and why. Most people, most of the time, cannot easily answer this for the small decisions that compose a day — the tone they used, the conversation they avoided, the hour they lost. There's something both sobering and freeing about this. Sobering because it suggests we are less intentional than we imagine. Freeing because intentionality is not some fixed property you either have or lack — it's a capacity you can actually practise, by learning to ask yourself, before and after you act, what the action is for. That question, held lightly and honestly, might be one of the most useful habits a person can develop.
A Question to Ponder
Think of one thing you did yesterday that you'd describe as a choice — can you actually say why you did it, in a way that goes deeper than 'I just felt like it'?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable