The Sociology of Religion
Why Rituals Work Even When You Don't Believe in Them
The most powerful thing about religious ritual might have nothing to do with the supernatural.
The Idea
Emile Durkheim, the 19th-century French sociologist who basically invented the serious study of religion, made a claim that still unsettles people: religion is not primarily about gods. It is about groups. When people gather to perform the same acts — chanting, fasting, kneeling, singing — something measurable happens to them. They start to feel what Durkheim called 'collective effervescence': a buzzing, electric sense of being lifted out of yourself and merged into something larger. The content of the belief, he argued, is almost secondary. The ritual is the engine. This reframing is not an attack on religion — it is actually a deeper account of why religion is so extraordinarily durable. Across every human culture ever documented, without exception, you find ritual. You find it in hunter-gatherer societies with no writing, in ancient empires, in modern megachurches, in secular substitutes like football stadiums and political rallies. The form changes; the function does not. What ritual does, sociologically, is solve a problem that is very hard to solve any other way: how do you make a group of strangers feel genuinely bonded to one another? Shared belief helps, but shared action — especially synchronised, embodied action — works faster and goes deeper. When bodies move together, trust follows. This is why militaries drill troops not just for coordination but for cohesion. The march is not the point. The solidarity forged by the march is.
In the World
In 2011, psychologist Dimitris Xygalatas and his colleagues conducted a study in Mauritius during a Hindu festival called Thaipusam Kavadi — a ceremony in which devotees pierce their skin with skewers and hooks as an act of devotion, then carry elaborate frames to a temple. Xygalatas wanted to know whether the intensity of the ritual affected social bonding, so he measured participants' heart rates during the ceremony and afterwards asked everyone — performers and spectators alike — how much they trusted strangers and were willing to donate to communal funds. The results were striking. The more physically demanding a person's participation had been, the more they donated and the more they trusted. Spectators who had a close family member performing showed higher solidarity than spectators who did not. Pain and effort, it turned out, were not incidental to the ritual — they were the mechanism. The cost of participation signalled genuine commitment, and that signal was legible to the whole community. This finding echoes something observed much more broadly: communities with demanding rituals tend to be more cooperative and more resilient. The anthropologist Richard Sosis studied Israeli kibbutzim in the early 2000s and found that religious kibbutzim outlasted secular ones by a significant margin — not because God was on their side, but because shared costly rituals kept free-riding in check. The ritual was, in effect, a social technology.
Why It Matters
Once you see religion through this lens, you start noticing ritual everywhere you had not named it as such. The way a family always watches a particular film on a particular night. The call-and-response of a crowd at a concert. The ceremonies around graduation, marriage, or grief. These are not pale imitations of 'real' ritual — they are the same mechanism operating at different scales. This matters for how you think about secularisation. As formal religious participation declines in many societies, the rituals that built solidarity go with it — and nothing obvious steps in to replace them. Some researchers argue this is a partial explanation for rising feelings of disconnection and loneliness in affluent, secular societies. The content of the old rituals may feel outdated, but the need they served did not disappear. It also matters personally. If you have ever felt oddly moved by a ceremony you do not intellectually believe in, or found yourself unexpectedly bonded to strangers after a shared ordeal, you have felt this mechanism firsthand. Recognising it does not diminish the experience. If anything, it makes the question of what rituals you choose to keep — or build — more urgent.
A Question to Ponder
What rituals in your own life are actually doing the work of holding you to other people — and what would quietly unravel if you stopped?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable