Does Technology Make Us Happier?
Why Instagram Makes You Feel Poor Even When You're Not
The psychological mechanism destroying your contentment right now was identified in 1954 — decades before the internet gave it a weapon.
The Idea
Leon Festinger's social comparison theory holds that humans have a deep, near-automatic drive to evaluate themselves against others. This isn't vanity or weakness — it's how we calibrate. In environments with no objective measure (how good am I at my job? how happy is my marriage?), we look sideways at other people and use them as the yardstick. The problem is that Festinger assumed a roughly fair contest: we compare ourselves to people nearby, people in broadly similar circumstances. What social media has done is shatter that assumption completely. The feed doesn't show you a representative cross-section of human life. It shows you a curated highlight reel from the most photogenic moments of people who are already incentivised — by likes, by attention, by the platform's own algorithm — to perform at their best. So you're no longer comparing yourself to your neighbour. You're comparing your Tuesday morning to someone else's Maldives holiday, your kitchen to a food stylist's set, your relationship to a couple who only posts when they're happy. This is called "upward social comparison," and research consistently links it to lower self-esteem, increased anxiety, and a distorted sense of what a normal life looks like. The cruelty of it is that the comparison feels real and fair, even when it is neither.
In the World
In 2017, researchers Melissa Hunt and Jean Twenge independently arrived at similar conclusions through different routes. Hunt ran a controlled experiment at the University of Pennsylvania, asking one group of students to limit their social media use to ten minutes per platform per day for three weeks, while a control group used it as normal. The limited-use group showed significantly lower levels of loneliness and depression by the end of the study — not just self-reported, but measured against validated psychological scales. Twenge, meanwhile, was analysing generational data and noticed something alarming: rates of teen depression and loneliness had tracked almost perfectly with smartphone adoption rates from around 2012 onward. Both researchers pointed at the same mechanism — not screen time in the abstract, but specifically the social comparison that platforms are structurally built to produce. Meta's own internal research, leaked in 2021 via Frances Haugen's whistleblowing, confirmed this internally. One slide from a Facebook research deck read: "We make body image issues worse for one in three teen girls." The company knew. The mechanism is not a bug that crept into the design; it is, in a meaningful sense, the product. Engagement goes up when envy goes up. The platform profits from the gap between who you are and who the feed tells you that you should be.
Why It Matters
Understanding this reframes the experience of scrolling. That vague dissatisfaction you feel after twenty minutes on a social platform is not random and it is not a personal failing — it is a predictable output of a system optimised for something other than your wellbeing. Naming it gives you a little leverage over it. Festinger's original insight was that comparison is not something we can simply switch off; it's too wired in. But we can change the reference group. Deliberately curating who you follow — moving toward accounts that show ordinary life, struggle, and process rather than polished outcomes — isn't naive positivity, it's a structural intervention in the comparison engine. More broadly, this matters because the unhappiness generated by social media isn't just a personal problem. It shapes political mood, consumer behaviour, and collective sense of whether life is going well or poorly. A society that constantly compares upward, against an artificial ceiling, is going to feel perpetually behind — regardless of how much it actually has.
A Question to Ponder
If you could see a genuinely representative feed — the full spectrum of how people actually live, not how they perform living — would you want to, or has the highlight reel become part of what you're looking for?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable