Superconductors
The Material That Forgets How to Resist
At a precise, often brutally cold temperature, certain materials stop resisting electricity entirely — not almost, not approximately, but absolutely zero, in a way that has no classical explanation and still isn't fully understood.
The Idea
Electrical resistance is so normal we barely think about it — every wire you've ever used converts a little energy into heat as electrons bump and scatter through the metal lattice. Superconductivity is the complete abolition of that process. Below a critical temperature, certain materials enter a state where electrons pair up into what are called Cooper pairs and flow through the material as a coherent quantum wave. They don't scatter. They don't lose energy. A current set in motion in a superconducting loop will, in theory, circulate forever. What makes this genuinely strange is that Cooper pairs shouldn't exist by any intuitive reasoning. Electrons carry negative charge, so they repel each other. The pairing happens through a subtle intermediary: as one electron moves through the crystal lattice, it slightly distorts it — attracts the positively charged ion cores toward its path — and this momentary distortion creates a region of higher positive charge that attracts the second electron. The two electrons are coupled through the fabric of the material itself, not through any direct interaction. This is described by BCS theory, developed in 1957 by Bardeen, Cooper, and Schrieffer, and it earned a Nobel Prize. But here's the uncomfortable truth: BCS theory explains conventional superconductors beautifully, and completely fails to explain a whole class of materials — the high-temperature superconductors — discovered in the 1980s that become superconducting at temperatures far warmer than the theory predicts. Physicists are still arguing about why.
In the World
In 1986, Georg Bednorz and K. Alex Müller at IBM's Zurich research lab were doing something slightly unfashionable: experimenting with ceramic oxides, a class of materials most physicists had written off as insulators — the last place you'd expect to find superconductivity. They found a barium-lanthanum-copper oxide compound that went superconducting at around 35 Kelvin. That might not sound warm, but in superconductivity terms, it was a bombshell. It shattered the theoretical ceiling that BCS theory had seemed to impose. Within months, labs worldwide were racing to push the temperature higher, and by 1987, a related compound had crossed 77 Kelvin — the boiling point of liquid nitrogen, which is cheap and widely available, unlike the liquid helium required for conventional superconductors. Bednorz and Müller won the Nobel Prize the same year they submitted their original paper, one of the fastest awards in the prize's history — a sign of just how seismic the discovery felt. The chase hasn't stopped. In 2023, a team announced room-temperature superconductivity in a material called LK-99 and briefly sent the internet into a frenzy. Within weeks, independent labs had failed to replicate it. The result was retracted. But the episode revealed something real: the hunger for a room-temperature superconductor — which would transform power grids, computing, and medical imaging — remains so intense that even a flawed preprint can temporarily feel like the edge of a new world.
Why It Matters
Superconductors are already woven into the world in ways most people don't notice. The MRI machine in your local hospital works because superconducting magnets can generate the intense, stable magnetic fields needed to image soft tissue — no conventional electromagnet could match it. The particle accelerators at CERN rely on kilometres of superconducting wire to steer particles around their loops. But these applications all require cooling to cryogenic temperatures, which is expensive, energy-intensive, and logistically complicated. A room-temperature superconductor would be something else entirely: power lines that waste nothing, computers that generate no heat, levitating trains that require no fuel to maintain speed. The reason physicists keep chasing it despite repeated false alarms isn't optimism or hype — it's that the physics says it might be possible, and the prize would be civilisational. Beyond the practical stakes, superconductivity is a reminder that quantum mechanics isn't just a story about the very small. Cooper pairs are a macroscopic quantum phenomenon — something the size of your hand can, under the right conditions, behave as a single quantum object. The boundary between the quantum and classical worlds is stranger and more porous than most physics education suggests.
A Question to Ponder
If a material that conducts electricity perfectly already exists — even if only at extreme temperatures — what does that tell you about the limits of what the physical world might eventually be made to do?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable