The Future of Money
Why Governments Are Quietly Terrified of a Cashless Society
The country that went furthest toward eliminating cash has spent the last few years desperately trying to bring it back.
The Idea
Sweden was the poster child for a cashless future — card payments everywhere, bank branches that refused notes, churches accepting tithes by tap. Then, around 2018, something shifted. The Riksbank, Sweden's central bank, started warning that the country had gone too far. Elderly citizens couldn't participate in the economy. Rural areas lost financial access. And crucially, officials realised that in a crisis — a cyberattack, a power grid failure, a war — a population with no cash and no muscle memory for using it would be frighteningly vulnerable. Sweden is now legally requiring banks to handle cash again. The end of cash isn't just a payments story. It's a power story. Physical currency is one of the last truly anonymous, infrastructure-independent financial tools most people have access to. When you hand over a note, no one logs it, no algorithm flags it, no platform can freeze it. The moment that disappears, every transaction you make flows through a private or government system — systems that can be hacked, surveilled, or selectively switched off. Central banks around the world are now racing to design digital currencies of their own — CBDCs — partly to modernise payments, but also to retain state control over money before private players like Visa, Mastercard, or crypto networks fill the vacuum completely. What looks like a convenience revolution is also a quiet contest over who controls the architecture of everyday economic life.
In the World
In 2021, Nigeria launched the eNaira — one of the world's first central bank digital currencies — with enormous fanfare. The government hoped it would pull millions of unbanked citizens into the formal economy and make transfers faster and cheaper. Eighteen months later, adoption was below 0.5% of the population. Nigerians, already mistrustful of government institutions after years of currency devaluations and frozen accounts, simply didn't want a digital currency issued by the same central bank that had let them down before. Cash, for all its friction, felt safer because it was harder to confiscate. Then came an accidental experiment. In late 2022, the Central Bank of Nigeria redesigned its physical banknotes and imposed strict limits on cash withdrawals — ostensibly to modernise the system, though the timing before a national election raised eyebrows. Cash became scarce. ATMs ran dry. People queued for hours. Protests broke out. And the eNaira, still sitting unused on government servers, didn't save anyone. What Nigeria demonstrated — painfully, at scale — is that the transition away from cash isn't just a technical question about payment rails. It's a question of institutional trust built over decades. You can't leapfrog that with an app. The countries moving most smoothly toward digital payments aren't the ones with the most sophisticated technology; they're the ones with populations that already believe the system won't be used against them.
Why It Matters
Most of us don't think about cash until we can't get it. But the design of payment systems shapes who has power and who doesn't in ways that rarely make headlines until something goes wrong. If your savings are entirely digital, you are dependent on a chain of private companies and government institutions maintaining access on your behalf — and on the assumption that they will always act in your interest. That's probably fine most of the time. But 'most of the time' is a fragile basis for something as fundamental as the ability to buy food or pay rent. This isn't an argument to stuff notes under a mattress. It's an invitation to notice that the frictionless convenience of tapping your phone is also a form of dependence — on infrastructure, on institutions, on continued goodwill from the platforms that sit between you and your money. Understanding that dependence doesn't make you a paranoid prepper. It makes you a more clear-eyed participant in an economy that is changing faster than most people realise, in ways that most people haven't been asked to vote on.
A Question to Ponder
If the payment systems you rely on were unavailable for a week — through a cyberattack, a company decision, or a government order — how would your daily life actually hold up?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable