Ritual and Ceremony
Why Humans Have Always Done Useless Things Together
Every known human society, no matter how isolated, has wasted time in exactly the same way: performing elaborate, repeated actions that produce nothing edible, buildable, or survivable.
The Idea
Ritual is one of anthropology's most stubborn puzzles, precisely because it seems to defy the logic of efficiency. A ritual, at its core, is a formalised, repeated action whose meaning exceeds its practical function — or has no practical function at all. Pouring wine on the ground achieves nothing agronomically. Circumambulating a shrine changes no physical reality. Yet from Neanderthal burial sites to contemporary graduation ceremonies, humans have always done these things, and done them with enormous seriousness. What researchers like Roy Rappaport and later Harvey Whitehouse have argued is that this apparent uselessness is precisely the point. Ritual's 'inefficiency' is a feature, not a bug. Because ritual cannot be evaluated by ordinary cost-benefit logic, it creates a category of action that signals genuine commitment. You can fake enthusiasm. It's much harder to fake three days of initiation ordeal, or a lifetime of weekly attendance, or the sacrifice of something genuinely valuable. There's also a cognitive dimension. Whitehouse's 'modes of religiosity' theory distinguishes between high-frequency, low-arousal rituals — which bind large communities through shared routine — and rare, high-intensity rituals, which forge deep, lasting bonds among smaller groups through shared ordeal. The same species that built cities also invented both the Sunday service and the hazing ritual, and for related reasons. Ritual, it turns out, is social technology.
In the World
In the early 1990s, psychologist Dimitris Xygalatas began studying the Thaipusam Kavadi festival in Mauritius, where Hindu devotees pierce their skin with skewers, hang weighted hooks from their flesh, and carry heavy wooden frames for hours — all without anaesthesia and, remarkably, often without visible pain or bleeding. What Xygalatas found when he measured physiological markers was striking: the heart rates of participants and their close spectators synchronised during the most intense moments of the ritual. People who had not touched a skewer were physically bonded to those who had. He then ran controlled experiments comparing communities that performed high-ordeal rituals versus low-effort ones. The high-ordeal groups consistently showed greater generosity toward fellow community members in subsequent economic games — but only toward those who had shared the experience. The ordeal didn't make people generally kinder; it made them deeply loyal to a specific group. This is why militaries across the world independently arrived at gruelling initiation rituals. It's why secret societies from the Freemasons to university fraternities use discomfort and exclusivity as binding agents. The content of the ritual barely matters. What matters is that it was hard, shared, and yours. The apparently irrational act of suffering together turns out to be one of the most rational investments in social cohesion a group can make.
Why It Matters
Once you see ritual as social technology rather than superstition or performance, two things shift. First, you start noticing rituals everywhere — including secular ones you've never labelled as such. The insistence on a specific mug for your morning coffee. The pre-match warm-up routine. The way your family marks certain occasions with specific foods that 'have' to be right. These aren't just habits; they're low-intensity rituals doing real psychological work, creating continuity, marking transitions, signalling belonging. Second, it becomes harder to dismiss unfamiliar rituals as primitive or irrational. When you encounter a ceremony that looks strange from the outside — whether it's an elaborate mourning custom, a coming-of-age ordeal, or a festival that seems to have no point — the anthropologically informed response is to ask what social or psychological function it serves, not whether it 'makes sense.' Most of the time, it makes a great deal of sense. It's doing something that laws, contracts, and incentives cannot do alone: it's making people feel genuinely bound to each other.
A Question to Ponder
Which rituals in your own life are actually doing the most work to hold your relationships or sense of self together — and what would quietly collapse if you stopped performing them?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable