OPEC and oil politics
The Afternoon They Turned Off the Tap
On a single October afternoon in 1973, a group of Arab oil ministers made a decision that would strand cars on highways, plunge governments into crisis, and permanently shatter the Western world's assumption that cheap energy was a birthright.
The Idea
For most of the twentieth century, the global oil market operated on a quiet fiction: that the countries sitting atop the world's largest reserves were essentially passive suppliers, and that the industrialised nations who needed the oil held all the real power. OPEC — the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries — was founded in Baghdad in 1960 partly to push back against that fiction, but for its first decade it was more a talking shop than a force capable of collective action. What changed in October 1973 was political fury translated into economic leverage. After the United States resupplied Israel during the Yom Kippur War, the Arab members of OPEC announced an embargo: no oil to the US or any country supporting Israel. The price of a barrel quadrupled almost overnight. Petrol queues stretched for miles. Governments that had built entire economic models on the assumption of cheap, abundant oil found themselves suddenly, humiliatingly exposed. The deeper significance was structural, not just situational. The embargo demonstrated that commodity producers — when organised, disciplined, and politically motivated — could wield the supply chain as a geopolitical weapon. It was the first time in the postwar era that the terms of global commerce were dictated not by the industrialised importers but by the exporting nations. The concept of 'resource nationalism' stopped being theoretical. It became a lived reality felt at every petrol station in the developed world.
In the World
The clearest window into what the embargo actually felt like is the United States in the winter of 1973–74. President Nixon introduced emergency measures almost immediately: a national speed limit of 55 miles per hour (framed as fuel conservation), daylight saving time extended through winter, and a ban on ornamental Christmas lighting. The NFL considered cancelling games to save energy. Airlines grounded routes. But the most visceral symbol was the queue. Petrol stations introduced odd-even rationing — if your number plate ended in an odd number, you could only fill up on odd-numbered days. Even so, the queues were hours long. Fistfights broke out. Station owners reported receiving death threats when they ran dry. Some drivers slept in their cars overnight to hold their place in line. The man who perhaps understood the moment most clearly was Sheikh Ahmed Zaki Yamani, Saudi Arabia's oil minister, who would become one of the most recognisable faces of the decade. Yamani had argued internally for using oil as a political lever for years; when the moment came, he executed the embargo with a cool precision that mesmerised and alarmed Western capitals in equal measure. He was once asked whether he felt the producers had been too aggressive. His answer was essentially: for thirty years, the price was set by others, in other people's currencies, in other people's boardrooms. Now it was not.
Why It Matters
The 1973 embargo sits at the origin point of several things we now take for granted. The modern obsession with energy security — the strategic oil reserves, the diversification of supply chains, the long Western anxiety about Middle Eastern stability — traces directly back to those queues on American highways. It also permanently altered how people think about commodity markets and the politics embedded in them. Before 1973, 'trade' and 'geopolitics' were often treated as separate domains. After, it became impossible to discuss supply chains without asking who controls them and under what political conditions. More personally: if you have ever thought about where your energy comes from, or felt a flicker of unease at dependence on systems you cannot see or control, that instinct has a history. The embargo didn't create resource anxiety, but it made it conscious — first for governments, then for ordinary people. Understanding why that moment happened, and who drove it, gives you a sharper lens for reading every contemporary dispute about pipelines, sanctions, and trade routes.
A Question to Ponder
If control over a critical resource can shift the balance of power between nations almost overnight, which resource today — if suddenly restricted — would cause the same kind of structural shock that oil did in 1973?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable