Romantic Relationships
The Closeness Trick: Why Asking Better Questions Is an Act of Love
In 1997, a psychologist made two strangers fall in love in a laboratory — and the method had nothing to do with chemistry.
The Idea
Arthur Aron, a social psychologist at Stony Brook University, had a theory: intimacy isn't something that happens to you over time, it's something that's generated through a specific kind of mutual vulnerability. To test it, he sat pairs of strangers across from each other and had them take turns asking and answering 36 carefully sequenced questions — questions that started relatively easy and grew progressively more personal. Within 45 minutes, many pairs reported feeling closer to their partner than to people they'd known for years. One couple eventually married. What Aron was really after isn't romantic love as a destination — it's the mechanism that creates closeness itself. He called it 'self-expansion': the feeling that through another person, you are becoming more than you were. We are drawn to people who help us grow, who introduce us to new ideas, new capacities, new ways of seeing. But that expansion doesn't happen passively. It requires what Aron's study engineered deliberately: graduated disclosure and sustained, genuine attention. The insight that tends to get lost in the popularised version of this story is that the questions worked in both directions simultaneously. Both people were asking and answering. Both were being seen. Closeness, it turns out, is less about finding the right person and more about creating the right conditions — conditions where both parties feel safe enough to be gradually, honestly known.
In the World
Mandy Len Catron, a writer and academic, tried the 36 questions herself in 2015 — not in a lab, but in a bar in Vancouver with an acquaintance she was curious about. She later wrote about it in The New York Times in a piece that became one of the most shared articles the paper had published in years. The headline asked: 'To Fall in Love With Anyone, Do This.' What struck readers wasn't the romantic outcome (though she and her partner did fall in love). It was a single observation she made about the final question in Aron's sequence. After 35 questions, participants are asked to look into their partner's eyes for four minutes without speaking. Catron described it as the hardest part — not because it was awkward, but because it was so deliberately intimate that it felt almost transgressive. We spend enormous energy managing how much of ourselves we let others see. Aron's exercise simply asks you to stop. Catron later pushed back on the viral version of her own story. In a follow-up essay and a book, she argued that the questions didn't create love — they created the conditions for love to be possible. Which is a quieter but more useful finding. It means that the quality of your attention, your willingness to be curious about another person and to let them be curious about you, matters more than compatibility metrics, shared interests, or timing. Those things are real. They're just not where closeness actually lives.
Why It Matters
Most of us operate in long-term relationships on autopilot for much of the time — and that's not a failure, it's just how familiarity works. The brain economises. Routines form. The deep questions we asked in the early days get replaced by logistics: what's for dinner, who's calling the plumber, did you see that thing online. Aron's research suggests that this gradual narrowing of mutual curiosity isn't inevitable — it's a drift you can correct. Not by manufacturing grand romantic gestures, but by periodically choosing to be genuinely interested again. To ask a question you don't already know the answer to. To share something you haven't said aloud before. This matters beyond romance, too. The same mechanism — graduated vulnerability met with real attention — is what creates closeness in friendships, between parents and adult children, between colleagues who trust each other. But in romantic relationships, where we often assume we know everything already, it's easy to stop asking. Aron's work is a quiet reminder that being known is not a one-time event. It's something that has to keep happening.
A Question to Ponder
When did you last ask your partner — or someone close to you — a question you genuinely didn't know the answer to, and actually waited to hear it?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable