Cultural Imperialism
The Invisible Export: How One Culture's Normal Becomes Everyone's Default
When a Mexican teenager dreams of becoming a Hollywood actor rather than a storyteller in their own tradition, no one issued a decree — and that's precisely the point.
The Idea
Cultural imperialism isn't primarily about force. It's about the quiet, structural way that one culture's aesthetic categories, narrative forms, and values come to seem universal — while everything else gets filed under 'regional', 'traditional', or 'world'. The theorist Herbert Schiller, writing in the 1970s, identified it as a process inseparable from economic power: the same infrastructure that moves goods and capital also moves images, stories, and aspirations. But the concept has sharpened considerably since then. What makes it so slippery is that it rarely feels like imposition. It feels like preference. When a film industry, a publishing ecosystem, or a music distribution platform is scaled by capital concentrated in a handful of cities, the stories that get amplified aren't simply 'the best' — they're the ones that already fit a pre-existing grammar of what stories are supposed to do. A novel that doesn't resolve its central conflict, a film that privileges communal silence over individual confession, a song structure that doesn't follow a verse-chorus architecture — these aren't failures. But they face a steeper climb within global cultural markets built around different defaults. The result isn't a monoculture imposed by villains. It's something subtler: a narrowing of what seems possible, so gradual that it registers as taste.
In the World
In the early 2000s, Bollywood — already the world's most prolific film industry by volume — began a visible pivot. The shift wasn't just commercial; it was aesthetic. Films like 'Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham' (2001) began staging song sequences in Swiss Alpine landscapes and Scottish highlands, dressing characters in designer Western fashion, and scoring emotional climaxes to orchestral swells that owed more to John Williams than to classical ragas. Critics debated whether this was creative cosmopolitanism or a kind of self-exoticising aimed at the Non-Resident Indian diaspora — and at international prestige. But what's most instructive is the counter-movement it produced. Parallel cinema traditions in India, Iranian directors working under censorship constraints, the Nollywood industry in Nigeria producing on micro-budgets for hyper-local audiences — all of these developed partly in conscious resistance to what 'a film' was supposed to look and sound like. The Nigerian filmmaker Kunle Afolayan has spoken about the deliberate choice to make films that assume an African audience and refuse to translate cultural specifics for outsiders. That decision — to not explain your own reference points — is, quietly, a political one. It refuses the implicit hierarchy that places one audience's comprehension above another's experience of being fully seen.
Why It Matters
This isn't just a question for filmmakers or publishers. It shapes how any of us encounter unfamiliar work — and whether we notice the frame we're using to judge it. When something feels 'slow', 'unresolved', or 'hard to follow', it's worth asking whether that's an honest aesthetic response or a trained expectation meeting something it wasn't designed for. The same applies to how institutions — schools, galleries, streaming platforms, literary prizes — curate what gets elevated. Cultural imperialism persists not because anyone defends it explicitly, but because the infrastructure keeps defaulting to familiar forms, and familiarity compounds. What you can take from this is a practical habit: when you find a piece of work from outside your cultural orbit difficult or unsatisfying, sit with that friction a little longer before concluding anything. The discomfort might be the most interesting part — a signal that you're encountering a different set of assumptions about what art is even for.
A Question to Ponder
Is there a piece of art, music, or writing you once dismissed as 'difficult' that might have been speaking a grammar you simply hadn't learned yet?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable