Propaganda techniques
The Seven Moves That Have Always Worked on You
In 1937, a group of American scholars catalogued the exact psychological tricks being used to manipulate democratic publics — and every single one of them still works today.
The Idea
During the lead-up to the Second World War, a New York-based research group called the Institute for Propaganda Analysis published a landmark pamphlet identifying seven core propaganda techniques. They gave them plain, almost clinical names: Name-Calling, Glittering Generalities, Transfer, Testimonial, Plain Folks, Card Stacking, and the Bandwagon. What made this remarkable wasn't the list itself — rhetoricians had been cataloguing persuasion tactics since Aristotle — but the explicit democratic purpose: if citizens could name a technique in the moment of its use, the thinking went, they might resist it. The techniques are elegant in their simplicity. Name-Calling attaches a loaded label to an idea or person so you reject them without examining the evidence. Glittering Generalities does the reverse — wrapping a vague, appealing concept like 'freedom' or 'values' around an idea so you accept it without scrutiny. Transfer borrows the authority of something respected (a flag, a religious symbol, a scientific institution) and lends it to something unrelated. Card Stacking presents only the evidence that supports one side, not by lying outright but by omission. What's genuinely unsettling is that knowing these techniques offers only partial protection. Research in cognitive psychology consistently shows that inoculation helps — but not completely. We tend to spot propaganda aimed at 'other people' far more readily than propaganda aimed at us, because our tribal instincts are faster than our critical faculties.
In the World
Consider how Transfer operated in Nazi Germany — one of the most thoroughly studied propaganda systems in history. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's Minister of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda, understood instinctively that content mattered less than association. The swastika was deliberately positioned alongside imagery of ancient Germanic heritage and the Christian cross in early messaging, borrowing the emotional authority of ancestry and faith. Leni Riefenstahl's 1935 film Triumph of the Will didn't argue a case — it transferred the grandeur of classical mythology, communal belonging, and almost religious awe onto a political movement through pure visual grammar. But Transfer isn't only a tool of totalitarianism. When a pharmaceutical company films its advertisement in a doctor's consulting room, with an actor in a white coat speaking in measured, reassuring tones, that's Transfer. When a political candidate holds a town hall in a factory and eats at a local diner, that's Plain Folks — borrowing the legitimacy of ordinary life. When a health product is endorsed not by evidence but by a beloved sports figure, that's Testimonial stripped bare. The Institute for Propaganda Analysis was, ironically, dissolved in 1942 — partly because once America entered the war, the government needed to run its own propaganda campaigns, and a well-funded organisation teaching people to identify manipulation became inconvenient. The lesson landed with a quiet thud and was largely forgotten.
Why It Matters
These techniques haven't evolved much because they don't need to — they're exploiting the same cognitive shortcuts that have always governed human attention and trust. What has changed is the delivery mechanism. The speed, personalisation, and sheer volume of contemporary media means that the Bandwagon technique, for instance — 'everyone is saying this, you should too' — can now be simulated artificially at scale through coordinated accounts and algorithmically amplified engagement. The most practical thing to take from this isn't paranoia. Most communication isn't propaganda in any sinister sense. But developing the habit of asking 'what is this borrowing its authority from?' or 'what am I not being shown here?' is a genuinely useful cognitive tool — in politics, in advertising, in the news, and even in conversations with people you broadly agree with. The uncomfortable corollary is this: the techniques work on everyone, including the people deploying them. True believers are often the most effective propagandists precisely because they aren't consciously manipulating — they've already been moved by the same emotional logic they're passing on.
A Question to Ponder
Is there a belief you hold strongly that you arrived at through evidence — or did something else, something more like Transfer or the Bandwagon, do most of the work first?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable