Disability and Work
The Productivity Myth That Leaves Disabled Workers Behind
The modern workplace was not designed for the average worker — it was designed for a very specific body that rarely gets tired, never needs accommodating, and performs identically every day.
The Idea
Work, as most institutions have structured it, embeds a hidden assumption: that productivity is a stable, linear output. You show up, you perform, you repeat. Disability — whether visible or invisible, physical or neurological, chronic or fluctuating — tends to break that assumption in ways the system hasn't learned to absorb gracefully. What gets called an 'accommodation' is often framed as a concession, a workaround, something granted rather than something owed. But that framing obscures something important: most workplace norms were never neutral to begin with. The nine-to-five schedule, the open-plan office, the expectation of in-person presence — these were built around a particular kind of worker at a particular moment in industrial history. They were design choices, not laws of nature. Researchers in disability studies use the term 'crip time' to describe the way disabled people often experience and navigate time differently — not deficiently, but differently. A body managing chronic pain, or a mind navigating ADHD or autism, may work in bursts, need longer recovery windows, or simply function better at non-standard hours. When workplaces treat these rhythms as problems to be fixed rather than patterns to be understood, they lose something real: the cognitive diversity, the hard-won adaptability, and the distinct problem-solving that often accompanies navigating a world not built for you. The pandemic, ironically, ran an unplanned experiment. Remote and flexible work — long requested by disabled employees and long refused — turned out to work fine for enormous numbers of people. What was 'impossible' before 2020 became standard practice almost overnight.
In the World
In 2021, Haben Girma — a deaf-blind lawyer and the first deaf-blind graduate of Harvard Law School — gave a talk in which she described asking her employers for accessible documents early in her career. The response she often received wasn't malicious; it was baffled. The assumption was that someone with her profile simply wouldn't be doing this kind of work, so nobody had thought to make the tools work for her. Her experience reflects something documented across disability employment research: the barriers disabled workers face are less often outright hostility and more often institutional inertia — the quiet accumulation of systems, software, physical spaces, and cultural norms that weren't designed with variation in mind. There's a telling pattern in the data. Disabled workers, when given genuine flexibility, often outperform expectations — not because disability confers some cinematic superpower, but because people who have spent years developing workarounds for an inaccessible world tend to be exceptionally good at problem-solving under constraint. Scope, the UK disability charity, has documented this in employer surveys: managers who initially resisted accommodating disabled employees frequently reported, after doing so, that the adjustment cost was negligible and the outcomes were better than anticipated. The gap between what disabled workers can do and what they're given space to do isn't a talent gap. It's a design gap — and design gaps, unlike ability gaps, are fixable.
Why It Matters
If you are not disabled yourself, you may feel this is someone else's issue to work through. But consider what the disability-and-work conversation is really about: it's a stress test on how well any workplace handles human variation. The colleague managing a chronic illness, the teammate with ADHD, the person who works best in the afternoon rather than the morning — these aren't edge cases. They're the full range of how human beings actually are. When organisations build genuine flexibility into how work gets done, they tend to find it benefits people who never thought of themselves as needing accommodation — parents, carers, anyone going through a difficult period mentally or physically, which at some point is most of us. And if you are navigating disability yourself, in work or seeking it, there's something worth holding onto here: the friction you're encountering is largely structural, not personal. The design was wrong before you arrived. That doesn't make the friction less exhausting, but it does change where the responsibility for fixing it actually sits.
A Question to Ponder
What would your workplace — or your own working habits — look like if it were designed from the start around the full range of how human bodies and minds actually function, rather than retrofitted to accommodate them?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable