The History of Computing
The Accidental Revolution: How a Printer Jam Changed Software Forever
The modern internet runs on software that nobody owns, and it started because a programmer couldn't fix his own printer.
The Idea
Most products you use were built by people trying to make money. Open source software operates on a radically different premise: the code is public, anyone can inspect it, modify it, and redistribute it, and the act of sharing is treated as a feature, not a vulnerability. What's surprising isn't that this model exists — it's that it works, and at extraordinary scale. The servers running most of the internet, the Android phone in billions of pockets, the tools underpinning machine learning research — almost all of it is built on open source foundations. The movement has two distinct strands that are often conflated. There's the Free Software movement, championed by Richard Stallman from the early 1980s, which is explicitly ideological: software freedom is a moral right, and proprietary code is a form of social harm. Then there's the Open Source Initiative, formalised in 1998, which makes a more pragmatic case: open code is simply better code, because more eyes catch more bugs and the best developers contribute where they choose rather than where they're told. The tension between these two camps — ethics versus pragmatism — is genuine and unresolved. But what both share is a rejection of the assumption that scarcity and exclusion are the only ways to create value. In a world where copying a file costs nothing, the economics of software are genuinely strange, and open source is the movement that took that strangeness seriously.
In the World
In 1980, Richard Stallman was a programmer at MIT's AI Lab when a new Xerox laser printer arrived. It was fast but prone to paper jams, so Stallman wanted to modify the software to alert users when it jammed — a small, sensible fix. When he asked Xerox for the source code, he was refused. The code was proprietary. A colleague who had a copy had signed a non-disclosure agreement and couldn't share it. Stallman was furious — not just frustrated, but morally outraged. Here was a machine in a shared space, causing shared inconvenience, and the knowledge needed to fix it had been fenced off. By 1983, he launched the GNU Project to build a completely free operating system from scratch. In 1985, he published the GNU Manifesto, and in 1989, he released the GNU General Public License — the GPL — a legal instrument of elegant subversion. It used copyright law to guarantee freedom rather than restrict it: if you distribute software licensed under the GPL, any modifications you make must also be released under the GPL. This 'copyleft' mechanism meant that corporate enclosure couldn't quietly absorb free software and close it off again. When Linus Torvalds released the Linux kernel in 1991 — initially just a hobby project, he said — it filled the final gap in Stallman's vision. GNU plus Linux became the operating system that quietly took over the world, running everything from stock exchanges to spacecraft.
Why It Matters
Open source isn't just a footnote in computing history — it's a live demonstration that abundance-based economies can outcompete scarcity-based ones in certain conditions. The fact that volunteers and competing corporations co-maintain the same codebases, that companies like Google and Meta release internal tools publicly because doing so attracts better engineers and faster improvement, is genuinely strange from a classical economic standpoint. It also matters because the code shaping your life is increasingly opaque. When you understand that software can be open or closed — that the choice is deliberate, political, and consequential — you start asking different questions. Who can audit the algorithm deciding your loan application? Who can verify that a voting machine counts correctly? Open source doesn't automatically answer those questions, but it creates the conditions under which they can be answered. Finally, the open source movement is a useful reminder that infrastructure rarely gets credited. The digital world's plumbing is mostly invisible, mostly free, and mostly built by people you've never heard of — which is either a cause for gratitude or concern, depending on what happens when the maintenance stops.
A Question to Ponder
If the tools that run most of the internet are maintained by volunteers and funded inconsistently, what does that say about how we collectively value the infrastructure we depend on most?
Get a new one of these every morning.
Start learning with Thinkable